On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 6:29 PM, Davis, Michael <michael.da...@essvote.com>
wrote:

> After some more digging I found it is because the KTYPE is defined as
> standard/base and the spp script can only find standard.
>
> Is this expected behavior and yocto-bsp should be fixed or a bug and spp
> should be fixed?
>
>
>

That would be expected from the spp point of view, but if a tool is
generating that invalid KTYPE, that is a bug in the tool.

yocto-bsp was recently depreciated and removed in master recently, so
fixing it may not make sense at this point, but logging it in the bug
tracker (against the tool) wouldn't hurt.

Bruce


>
>
> *From:* Davis, Michael
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 05, 2017 4:45 PM
> *To:* 'openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org'
> *Subject:* Error caused by kernel-yocto: ensure that only valid BSPs are
> built
>
>
>
> After upgrading rocko all my builds are failing with the following message.
>
> *ERROR*: linux-yocto-4.12.14+gitAUTOINC+e3c9041f48_1d685baca1-r0.1
> do_kernel_metadata: Could not locate BSP definition for test/standard and
> no defconfig was provided
>
> The source of the issue seems to be commit 44aea7b87307795fe4e089c51d45af
> ccaa2f6525.
>
> This includes a fresh BSP I created with yocto-bsp create, so the helper
> tools are generating examples that don’t work.
>
> bsp_definition=$(spp ${includes} --find -DKMACHINE=${KMACHINE}
> -DKTYPE=${LINUX_KERNEL_TYPE}) always returns nothing even though I have
> .scc files defined.
>
> What is the new expected format to avoid this error?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
>


-- 
"Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee
at its end"
-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to