On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 1:59 PM, Alex Stewart <alex.stew...@ni.com> wrote: > On 01/13/2018 05:48 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:06 AM, Alex Stewart <alex.stew...@ni.com> >> wrote: >> As mentioned by Christopher, it will increase the build time for >> everyone and there is real gain in this this change. If you want to >> disable the busybox dependency then move hwclock.sh to a hwclock-init >> package that has no standard dependencies and is allarch and make >> busybox and util-linux to depends on it. > > Either solution works for my purposes, so I'm fine breaking hwclock.sh out > as its own recipe. It seems degenerative to break such a small piece of > common-code into its own recipe, but I suppose there isn't a better solution > if util-linux isn't commonly built.
Leaving it on busybox seems to be the commonly built package; moving to a specific package works too. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core