I know you didn't test this:  :)

On 26 February 2018 at 14:38, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

> @@ -40,8 +40,13 @@ SRC_URI = "${GLIBC_GIT_URI};branch=${SRCBRANCH};name=glibc
> \
>             file://0023-Define-DUMMY_LOCALE_T-if-not-defined.patch \
>             
> file://0024-elf-dl-deps.c-Make-_dl_build_local_scope-breadth-fir.patch
> \
>             file://0025-locale-fix-hard-coded-reference-to-gcc-E.patch \
> +<<<<<<< HEAD:meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc_2.26.bb
>             file://0027-glibc-reset-dl-load-write-lock-after-forking.patch
> \
>             file://0028-Bug-4578-add-ld.so-lock-while-fork.patch \
> +=======
> +           file://0026-reset-dl_load_write_lock-after-forking.patch \
> +           
> file://0027-Acquire-ld.so-lock-before-switching-to-malloc_atfork.patch
> \
> +>>>>>>> 2ce2695790... glibc: Upgrade to 2.27 release:meta/recipes-core/
> glibc/glibc_2.27.bb
>  "
>

Locally I've got the previous 2.27 upgrade squashed into a revert of the
2.26 bump, presumably there are no other changes required?
-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to