On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 16:30:55 +0000 "Burton, Ross" <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote:
> Because in GNU's infinite wisdom they're using renameat2() to do > atomic renames in the mv command, and as renameat2 isn't in the > headers for F27 it just does a syscall directly. This is in upstream > coreutils so once they make a release, everyone gets it. UGH. I... am really unsure whether it's possible to catch that, because I really, really, don't want to try to intercept raw syscall() calls. I don't think that ends well. I wonder if they can be persuaded to, you know, NOT use a syscall directly when it's not in the system headers, on the grounds that the system headers define the exported interface, and bypassing them is almost certainly a very bad idea. -s -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
