On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@wdc.com> wrote: > If the user has set numa as a distro feature enable NUMA support in the > kernel config.
Isn't NUMA something which would be machine specific rather than distro specific? > Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@wdc.com> > --- > meta/recipes-kernel/linux/files/numa.cfg | 4 ++++ > meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc | 3 +++ > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/linux/files/numa.cfg > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/files/numa.cfg > b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/files/numa.cfg > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..bb0f9ab > --- /dev/null > +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/files/numa.cfg > @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ > +CONFIG_NUMA=y > +CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA=y > +CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING=y > +CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING_DEFAULT_ENABLED=y > diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc > b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc > index 3bb872a..cf97cd1 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc > +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc > @@ -28,6 +28,9 @@ KERNEL_LD_append_nios2 = " ${TOOLCHAIN_OPTIONS}" > > KERNEL_FEATURES_append_qemuall=" features/debug/printk.scc" > > +SRC_URI += "${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'numa', ' > file://numa.cfg', '', d)}" > +KERNEL_FEATURES_append = " ${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'numa', > 'features/numa/numa.scc', '', d)}" > + > # A KMACHINE is the mapping of a yocto $MACHINE to what is built > # by the kernel. This is typically the branch that should be built, > # and it can be specific to the machine or shared > -- > 2.7.4 > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core