Sorry, no it doesn't. I've just picked this in ross/mut but a follow-up patch to remove that mystery patch (can't see it being used in image generation anywhere) would be good.
Ross On 20 June 2018 at 00:53, Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@denix.org> wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 01:16:34PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: >> On 22 May 2018 at 08:49, Andrea Adami <andrea.ad...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I am just wondering about this patch:we carry it since 2009 [1] and >> > is still marked as pending. >> > Why was it necessary to ignore part of the filesystem? Can you remember? >> >> Make that at least 2004. This commit in oe-classic touches it: >> >> commit c70605ebdca81412a93b4d867de7931543193f26 >> Author: Chris Larson <clar...@kergoth.com> >> Date: Thu Dec 23 21:24:57 2004 +0000 >> >> Update mtd to a current snapshot, change the mkfs.jffs2 -i cmdline >> option to >> -I, and rename mtd and mtd-native to mtd-utils and mtd-utils-native, >> respectively. >> >> Prior history is lost to the git/bk migration unless anyone has a >> BitKeeper clone to mine... > > So, does this prevent the version upgrade from being merged? > > -- > Denys -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
