Can you squash this, and the other fixes, into the recipe upgrade?
Master doesn't need to see the revisions and fixes, and having commits
which are broken is bad for bisecting.
Ross
On 12 July 2018 at 07:12, Chen Qi <qi.c...@windriver.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <qi.c...@windriver.com>
> ---
> meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_239.bb | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_239.bb
> b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_239.bb
> index 99fbfc1..ce8cc9a 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_239.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_239.bb
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ SRC_URI += "file://touchscreen.rules \
> SRC_URI_append_qemuall = "
> file://0001-core-device.c-Change-the-default-device-timeout-to-2.patch"
>
> # patches made for musl are only applied on TCLIBC is musl
> -SRC_URI += "${@d.getVar('SRC_URI_MUSL') if d.getVar('TCLIBC') == 'musl' else
> ''}"
> +SRC_URI += "${SRC_URI_MUSL}"
> SRC_URI_MUSL =
> "file://0001-Use-getenv-when-secure-versions-are-not-available.patch \
> file://0002-don-t-use-glibc-specific-qsort_r.patch \
>
> file://0003-comparison_fn_t-is-glibc-specific-use-raw-signature-.patch \
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
