Can you squash this, and the other fixes, into the recipe upgrade? Master doesn't need to see the revisions and fixes, and having commits which are broken is bad for bisecting.
Ross On 12 July 2018 at 07:12, Chen Qi <qi.c...@windriver.com> wrote: > Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <qi.c...@windriver.com> > --- > meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_239.bb | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_239.bb > b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_239.bb > index 99fbfc1..ce8cc9a 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_239.bb > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_239.bb > @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ SRC_URI += "file://touchscreen.rules \ > SRC_URI_append_qemuall = " > file://0001-core-device.c-Change-the-default-device-timeout-to-2.patch" > > # patches made for musl are only applied on TCLIBC is musl > -SRC_URI += "${@d.getVar('SRC_URI_MUSL') if d.getVar('TCLIBC') == 'musl' else > ''}" > +SRC_URI += "${SRC_URI_MUSL}" > SRC_URI_MUSL = > "file://0001-Use-getenv-when-secure-versions-are-not-available.patch \ > file://0002-don-t-use-glibc-specific-qsort_r.patch \ > > file://0003-comparison_fn_t-is-glibc-specific-use-raw-signature-.patch \ > -- > 1.9.1 > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core