On 11/08/2011 06:18 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 16:10 -0800, Joshua Lock wrote:
All,

Here's a series of patches I developed whilst trying to play around with some
Clutter based software.

The interesting pieces may be:
Clutter 1.8 series recipes - do we want/need to keep clutter 1.6 around?
Are we OK with continuing to namespace the clutter recipes by clutter
version?

Yes, I think this makes sense.

Yes to maintaining the version number, but not sure we want to keep 1.6 around, also do you need to add a similar .bbappend for clutter-1.8 for the meta-yocto atom-pc configuration?

Sau!

Gconf - I've pulled in GConf from upstream as the D-Bus backend is maintained
there now. For this I pulled in the gnome-related classes from meta-oe as they
simplified this recipe and I've been wanting to see them merged for some time.

I had to drop this patch as the gnome classes need a bit more work. I'd
like to get gconf resolved though.

Pulseaudio - whilst adding a required build dependency I changed the recipe so
that it doesn't require X unless the X11 distro feature is enabled.


So I merged the series apart from the gnome class and gconf pieces.

Cheers,

Richard


_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to