Dear Mark,

Am Dienstag, den 08.11.2011, 11:22 -0800 schrieb Saul Wold:
> From: Mark Hatle <mark.ha...@windriver.com>

I had to read several times to find out the meaning of »Uprev«. Maybe
using Update or Upgrade is easier for not native speakers.

Also the second »pseudo« can be dropped in the commit summary.

> This adds a new feature, PSEUDO_UNLOAD, which can be used to eliminate
> overhead of LD_PRELOAD when no longer necessary.
> 
> Also the, clone(2), support on Linux has been updated to resolve some
> potential defects in the previous implementation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.ha...@windriver.com>

Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net>

> ---
>  .../conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc |    6 +-
>  .../pseudo/pseudo/realpath_fix.patch               |  165 
> --------------------
>  .../pseudo/{pseudo_1.1.1.bb => pseudo_1.2.bb}      |    7 +-
>  meta/recipes-devtools/pseudo/pseudo_git.bb         |    6 +-
>  4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 175 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/pseudo/pseudo/realpath_fix.patch
>  rename meta/recipes-devtools/pseudo/{pseudo_1.1.1.bb => pseudo_1.2.bb} (48%)

[…]


Thanks,

Paul

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to