Hi Alejandro,

Many thanks for your comments, please check my comments inline.

On 2018年11月12日 23:28, Alejandro Hernandez wrote:
Hey Yu,


On 11/11/2018 6:28 PM, Yu, Mingli wrote:


On 2018年11月09日 21:02, Burton, Ross wrote:
On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 at 01:39, Yu, Mingli <mingli...@windriver.com> wrote:
Why is this here and not in the manifest?

It's because we can optionally enable or disable tk via PACKAGECONFIG,
if add it to manifest then we need to always enable tk which is also
the
implement in v1.

Are you sure?  As I understand it there won't be any errors if the
contents don't exist.  And to be honest if there are, then the
manifest tooling should handle that neatly without special-casing.

Hi Ross,

Thanks for your feedback!

I didn't quite understand what you mean. As I know, if we add the the
setting in manifest as below:
diff --git
a/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3/python3-manifest.json
b/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3/python3-manifest.json
index f922561..09c9199 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3/python3-manifest.json
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3/python3-manifest.json
@@ -1056,10 +1056,12 @@
     "tkinter": {
         "summary": "Python Tcl/Tk bindings",
         "rdepends": [
-            "core"
+            "core",
+            "tk"


This error is happening because you are trying to add python3-tk on
RDEPENDS, and that package doesn't exist, when you specify "foo" on the
"rdepends" section of the manifest it is translated to ${PN}-foo.

Yes, that's why I point out that we need to add extra logic in python3 recipe to make it rdepends on tk after add the logic as below:

diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3/python3-manifest.json b/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3/python3-manifest.json
index f922561..09c9199 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3/python3-manifest.json
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3/python3-manifest.json
@@ -1056,10 +1056,12 @@
     "tkinter": {
         "summary": "Python Tcl/Tk bindings",
         "rdepends": [
-            "core"
+            "core",
+            "tk"
         ],
         "files": [
-            "${libdir}/python${PYTHON_MAJMIN}/tkinter"
+            "${libdir}/python${PYTHON_MAJMIN}/tkinter",
+            "${libdir}/python${PYTHON_MAJMIN}/lib-dynload/_tkinter*.so"
         ],
         "cached": []
     },


So two things:

1. The manifest can have the _tkinter.*.so on the "files section of
tkinter (please note that this is _tkinter.*.so and not _tkinter*.so,
the wildcard should be after a "." this is to keep a standard which the
tooling can handle more easily.

Got it, thanks!


When the PACKAGECONFIG is enabled, the files for tkinter will be picked
up correctly.

2. You should not manually add "rdepends" to the manifest, the tool
itself should populate those automatically, this is better because we
would avoid this kind of errors.

Please add the package to the manifest, populate the "files" and
"summary" section and then run $ bitbake python3 -c create_manifest to
populate the rdepends section automatically, also keep in mind that you
should run this when the PACKAGECONFIG is enabled for the native package
as well (thats how it will pick up the dependencies).

No new package needed to add to manifest, we only need to update the items for the existed package tkinter and per your suggestion not manually add "rdepends" to the manifest, so I only add files to manifest as below in manifest file,

diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3/python3-manifest.json b/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3/python3-manifest.json
index f922561..09c9199 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3/python3-manifest.json
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3/python3-manifest.json
@@ -1056,10 +1056,12 @@
"tkinter": {
"summary": "Python Tcl/Tk bindings",
"rdepends": [
    "core"
],
"files": [
- "${libdir}/python${PYTHON_MAJMIN}/tkinter"
+ "${libdir}/python${PYTHON_MAJMIN}/tkinter",
+ "${libdir}/python${PYTHON_MAJMIN}/lib-dynload/_tkinter*.so"
],
"cached": []
},

And also the update the python3 recipe,

diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3_3.5.6.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3_3.5.6.bb
index 2a45476..e50e7dc 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3_3.5.6.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3_3.5.6.bb
@@ -78,10 +78,11 @@ export CCSHARED = "-fPIC"
 # Fix cross compilation of different modules
export CROSSPYTHONPATH = "${STAGING_LIBDIR_NATIVE}/python${PYTHON_MAJMIN}/lib-dynload/:${B}/build/lib.linux-${TARGET_ARCH}-${PYTHON_MAJMIN}:${S}/Lib:${S}/Lib/plat-linux"

-PACKAGECONFIG ??= "readline ${@bb.utils.contains('MACHINE_FEATURES', 'qemu-usermode', 'pgo', '', d)}" +PACKAGECONFIG ??= "readline ${@bb.utils.contains('MACHINE_FEATURES', 'qemu-usermode', 'pgo', '', d)} tk"
 PACKAGECONFIG[readline] = ",,readline"
 # Use profile guided optimisation by running PyBench inside qemu-user
 PACKAGECONFIG[pgo] = "--enable-optimizations"
+PACKAGECONFIG[tk] = ",,tk,tk"

And then I run $ bitbake python3 -c create_manifest, but there is no change in manifest file.

Thanks,



Cheers,

Alejandro


],
         "files": [
-            "${libdir}/python${PYTHON_MAJMIN}/tkinter"
+            "${libdir}/python${PYTHON_MAJMIN}/tkinter",
+ "${libdir}/python${PYTHON_MAJMIN}/lib-dynload/_tkinter*.so"
         ],
         "cached": []
     },

There comes below error:
ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'python3-tk' (but
/mybuild/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3_3.5.6.bb
RDEPENDS on or otherwise requires it)
NOTE: Runtime target 'python3-tk' is unbuildable, removing...
Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['python3-tk']
ERROR: Required build target 'python3' has no buildable providers.
Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['python3', 'python3-tk']

That's to say, we still need to add some fix in
meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3_3.5.6.bb. If so, it may be
flexible and clear to directly to make the implement just as what I
send in the RR.

Thanks,


Ross


--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to