Hi,
yes fw-utils is similar, but has different dependencies and builds slightly
differently.
mkenvimage on the other hand is already built by current u-boot-mkimage
recipe, just not installed by default (adding separate recipe would build
it twice).
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 11:32 AM Alexey Brodkin <alexey.brod...@synopsys.com>
wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Thu, 2018-11-15 at 10:27 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 05:15:03AM +0000, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > > Hi Marek,
>
> [snip]
>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de>
> > > >
> > > > That said, could the recipe for mkimage and mkenvimage be somehow
> > > > deduplicated ? There seems to be a lot of common stuff.
> > >
> > > I'd say why don't we just have one recipe for all U-Boot tools
> > > instead of adding tools one-by-one?
> >
> > Or add:
> > install -m 0755 tools/mkenvimage ${D}${bindir}/uboot-mkenvimage
> > ln -sf uboot-mkenvimage ${D}${bindir}/mkenvimage
> >
> > to existing u-boot-mkimage recipe, that's what I'm doing in
> > u-boot-mkimage bbappend.
>
> Sure and indeed that was my initial intention but then I noticed
> there're separate recipes for mkimage and fw-utils and decided
> to act similarly.
>
> If OE people is fine with addition of another (pretty similar
> ideologically)
> utility in u-boot-mkimage_xx.bb then I'm happy to implement it that way.
>
> -Alexey
>
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
