On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:19 AM Damien Riegel <damien.rie...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 09:04, Vincent Prince > <vincent.prince...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Khem, > > > > GO_DYNLINK_x86-64 = "" solution works as well, > > > > Best regards, > > Vincent > > > > Le jeu. 28 févr. 2019 à 14:14, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> a écrit : > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:35 AM Vincent Prince > >> <vincent.prince...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > Hi Damien, > >> > > >> > With GO_LINKSHARED = "" it work fine. > >> > > >> > >> Please set > >> GO_DYNLINK_x86-64 = "1" > >> to > >> GO_DYNLINK_x86-64 = "" > >> in goarch.bbclass > > Well, making a change in the goarch.bbclass is way more intrusive than > changing the value in a single recipe, so it would be nice to (at least) > give some justification about this solution. >
this will make static binaries instead, so I wonder if its doing some linking from host. > >> > >> > I'm very new to Go, does it mean that there is a mixing issue in go > >> > modules from Yocto and from node_exporter vendor folder, so it links > >> > wrongly at runtime? > > As to why the GO_LINKSHARED ="" works, I cannot tell. I just noticed > that our application was linked differently on my machine (where it > worked) and in Yocto (where it didn't work), so I tweaked link flags > until I got it to work. > > Cheers, > Damien -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
