On Tuesday 22 November 2011 18:25:25 Koen Kooi wrote: > Does it still suffer from the bug where it will break if you change machine > and something goes backward in PV (e.g. gcc 4.6 is used on arm, but 4.5 on > ppc)?
If the package in question is not tied to the machine or the arch that was changed, yes it will still cause do_package to fail. I'd be happy to address this, but my question would be, how do we tell the difference between a legitimate version pinning and when something has gone wrong? Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
