Hi RP,
Any comments here?
Thanks,
On 2019年04月16日 11:14, Yu, Mingli wrote:
On 2019年04月15日 19:08, richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Mon, 2019-04-15 at 17:05 +0800, mingli...@windriver.com wrote:
@@ -33,6 +29,8 @@ EXTRA_OECONF = "--disable-openssl"
CFLAGS_append = " -std=c99"
do_compile_ptest() {
+ # fix dlopen-test failure as cannot locate libnettle.so
+ sed -i 's;dlopen ("../libnettle.so", RTLD_NOW);dlopen
("${libdir}/libnettle.so", RTLD_NOW);g' ${S}/testsuite/dlopen-test.c
oe_runmake buildtest
}
@@ -49,4 +47,7 @@ do_install_ptest() {
install ${B}/testsuite/*-test ${D}${PTEST_PATH}/testsuite/
}
+RDEPENDS_${PN}-ptest += "${PN}-dev"
+INSANE_SKIP_${PN}-ptest += "dev-deps"
+
BBCLASSEXTEND = "native nativesdk"
Does Adrian's suggestion of removing the "../" work? Also, can we
Yes, the Adrian's suggestion works. But I think it's also okay to update
the actual libnettle.so path in do_compile_ptest phase as we still need
an extra patch if use Adrian's suggestion.
install a symlink in do_install_ptest which this code would find? That
Install a symlink? Does it means nettle-ptest will provide libnettle.so?
@@ -45,6 +49,7 @@ do_install_ptest() {
# tools can be found in PATH, not in ../tools/
sed -i -e 's|../tools/||' ${D}${PTEST_PATH}/testsuite/*-test
install ${B}/testsuite/*-test ${D}${PTEST_PATH}/testsuite/
+ ln -s ${libdir}/libnettle.so.6.5 ${D}${PTEST_PATH}/libnettle.so
}
would be less invasive and we could potentially remove the -dev package
dependency which would be good from an image perspective.
Just nettle-ptest rdepends on nettle-dev.
Cheers,
Richard
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
