On Fri, 2019-05-10 at 09:45 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 5:10 AM <
> luca.bocca...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
> > From: Luca Boccassi <
> > luca.bocca...@microsoft.com
> > >
> > 
> > portable services have been declared production ready with v241, so
> > enable
> > by default and install the files in the main package.
> > 
> 
> what is the rationale to enable it by default ?

Hi,

commit ada8a5d9175b disabled it by default because it was experimental:
"Add a new PACKAGECONFIG item 'portabled'. Default to disable it
because it's still experimental, according to the announcement letter."

Now it's been declared as stable by upstream, and also given machined
and nspawn are enabled by default I don't see a reason why this
shouldn't be as well, as they all provide the same "kind" of
feature/functionality, albeit on a different level.

> > Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi <
> > luca.bocca...@microsoft.com
> > >
> > ---
> > v2: Just enable by default, and let the files be installed in the
> > main package
> >     as requested by reviewers.
> > 
> >  meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_242.bb | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_242.bb
> > b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_242.bb
> > index 73e03c7a77..f15d125bf8 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_242.bb
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_242.bb
> > @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ PACKAGECONFIG ??= " \
> >      nss \
> >      nss-mymachines \
> >      nss-resolve \
> > +    portabled \
> >      quotacheck \
> >      randomseed \
> >      resolved \
> > --
> > 2.20.1
> > 
> > --
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openembedded-core mailing list
> > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> > 
> > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
> > 
-- 
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to