On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 05:18:25PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 01:03:37PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > This pulls bc to many images with busybox, causing busybox postinst to fail > > with: > > > > update-alternatives: Error: not linking /usr/bin/bc to /bin/busybox.nosuid > > since /usr/bin/bc exists and is not a link > > Are you enabling CONFIG_BC in your busybox config? > It is not enabled in meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox/defconfig
It's not disabled in my defconfig like it is in meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox/defconfig, maybe it got auto enabled. In log.do_configure I see: ... * * Miscellaneous Utilities * adjtimex (4.7 kb) (ADJTIMEX) [N/y/?] n bbconfig (9.7 kb) (BBCONFIG) [N/y/?] n bc (45 kb) (BC) [Y/n/?] (NEW) dc (36 kb) (DC) [Y/n/?] y Use bc code base for dc (larger, more features) (FEATURE_DC_BIG) [Y] (NEW) y Interactive mode (+4kb) (FEATURE_BC_INTERACTIVE) [Y/n/?] (NEW) Enable bc/dc long options (FEATURE_BC_LONG_OPTIONS) [Y/n] (NEW) beep (2.4 kb) (BEEP) [N/y/?] n chat (6.3 kb) (CHAT) [N/y/?] n conspy (10 kb) (CONSPY) [N/y/?] n ... > > I'll check which busybox defconfig entry enables BC and send patch to use > > u-a for bc in ./meta/recipes-extended/bc/bc_1.07.1.bb > > > > There already is: > > ALTERNATIVE_${PN} = "dc" > > ALTERNATIVE_PRIORITY = "100" > > but maybe dc is a typo. > > bc and dc are two different binaries built from bc. > > busybox used to only have dc, bc was added 6 months ago. Thanks I've never noticed dc before. I see both dc and bc in 1.06 version from meta-gplv2 which was released on 2000-11-15 bc/1.06-r3/image/usr/bin/bc As there is already u-a for dc, I will sent u-a for bc as well. -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core