On Wed, 2019-06-12 at 19:12 +0800, zhe...@windriver.com wrote: > From: He Zhe <zhe...@windriver.com> > > The git based recipe is for those who want to build lttng-modules with > bleeding > edge kernel, to avoid regularly backporting patches from upstream. > > Note that PREFERRED_VERSION needs to be set to select the git recipe instead > of > the tar ball one. > > Signed-off-by: He Zhe <zhe...@windriver.com> > --- > v2: Correct a typo in SOB in 0001 > v3: Use devupstream to make it more clean and clear > > meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-modules_2.10.9.bb | 11 ++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-modules_2.10.9.bb > b/meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-modules_2.10.9.bb > index 70a6843..dfd166a 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-modules_2.10.9.bb > +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-modules_2.10.9.bb > @@ -11,7 +11,6 @@ inherit module > > COMPATIBLE_HOST = > '(x86_64|i.86|powerpc|aarch64|mips|nios2|arm|riscv).*-linux' > > -#https://lttng.org/files/lttng-modules/lttng-modules-2.10.7.tar.bz2 > SRC_URI = "https://lttng.org/files/${BPN}/${BPN}-${PV}.tar.bz2 \ > file://Makefile-Do-not-fail-if-CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS-is-not-en.patch > \ > file://BUILD_RUNTIME_BUG_ON-vs-gcc7.patch \ > @@ -34,3 +33,13 @@ python do_package_prepend() { > bb.warn("%s: no modules were created; this may be due to > CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS not being enabled in your kernel." % d.getVar('PN')) > } > > +BBCLASSEXTEND = "devupstream:target" > +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM_class-devupstream = > "file://LICENSE;md5=3f882d431dc0f32f1f44c0707aa41128" > +DEFAULT_PREFERENCE_class-devupstream = "-1" > +SRC_URI_class-devupstream = "git://git.lttng.org/lttng-modules;branch=master > \ > + file://Makefile-Do-not-fail-if-CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS-is-not-en.patch > \ > + file://BUILD_RUNTIME_BUG_ON-vs-gcc7.patch \ > + " > +SRCREV_class-devupstream = "${AUTOREV}" > +PV_class-devupstream = "2.11.0-rc+git${SRCPV}" > +S_class-devupstream = "${WORKDIR}/git"
OE-Core can't access the network by default so this will need to be a specific SRCREV which you can set to AUTOREV in local config if that makes sense. I've sent a separate email to openembedded-architecture about a better syntax for some of this but that isn't anything wrong with this patch, more just the way devupstream works. Cheers, Richard -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
