On Fri, 2019-06-21 at 15:26 -0400, Jon Mason wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 1:44 PM Jon Mason <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 12:58 PM < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I realise there is slightly more overhead but it might give us > > > more > > > chance of fixing all the races? > > > > 4 extra function calls would almost be statistical noise. I'll > > code > > it up to do the check every time regardless and add it for each > > syslogd/klogd call. > > A timed run of testimage on a Cortex A57x4 system (with KVM enabled) > went from ~1m21s (1m23s, 1m22s,1m20s) to ~1m23s (1m22s, 1m25s, > 1m24s). > Without KVM enabled, it went from 20m6s to 20m56s. It's possible with > a larger sample size that they would converge even more, but I think > this is sufficient to show it's not a deal breaker to run it every > time.
Sound good to me, thanks! :) Cheers, Richard -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
