Hi Richard,
would KERNEL_CMD_LINES a better variable name for this case?
On 8/2/19, 11:46 PM, "Richard Purdie" <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org>
wrote:
On Fri, 2019-08-02 at 20:33 +0800, chee.yang....@intel.com wrote:
> From: Chee Yang Lee <chee.yang....@intel.com>
>
> introduce new variable APPENDS to define multiple
> boot configuration for systemd-boot and grub-efi.
>
> APPENDS set the different in kernel option for each .conf
> file(for systemd-boot) or menuentry(for grub-efi).
> Include the differences in the title.
> Separate each configuration with ";".
>
> e.g.:
> APPEND = "console=tty0 rootwait"
> APPENDS = " i915.enable_guc=0; i915.enable_guc=2"
>
> for systemd-boot, above setting will produce 2 .conf,
> boot-1.conf and boot-2.conf which set with below title and option:
>
> boot-1.conf -
> title boot-1 i915.enable_guc=0
> option console=tty0 rootwait i915.enable_guc=0
>
> boot-2.conf -
> title boot-2 i915.enable_guc=2
> option console=tty0 rootwait i915.enable_guc=2
>
>
> also update oeqa/selftest/wic testcase to fit the new variable.
APPEND was a horrible choice of variable name. Lets not compound the
problem by adding new versions of it!
Cheers,
Richard
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
