On 8/23/19 10:26 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 09:28:11AM +0800, Hongxu Jia wrote:
On 8/23/19 1:01 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 09:40:18AM +0800, Hongxu Jia wrote:
- Update Debian patches
http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/e/elfutils/elfutils_0.176-1.debian.tar.xz
- Rebase Debian patches to 0.177
debian/hppa_backend.diff
debian/mips_backend.diff
debian/arm_backend.diff
debian/mips_readelf_w.patch
debian/testsuite-ignore-elflint.diff
debian/mips_cfi.patch
...
...1-fix-compile-failure-with-debian-patches.patch | 48 ++++++++
...
.../elfutils/files/debian/hppa_backend.diff | 57 +++++----
.../elfutils/files/debian/hurd_path.patch | 17 +--
...
.../elfutils/files/debian/kfreebsd_path.patch | 13 +-
...
.../elfutils/files/debian/mips_cfi.patch | 131
+++++++++++++++++++++
...
Why are we following Debian patches in a package with active upstream?
I am afraid no, we need to rebase them (0.176) to 0.177
The part about rebasing existing patches is clear.
But why are we for example adding mips_cfi.patch when this is not upstream?
There might be a good reason for doing so, but "because it is a Debian patch"
is not a good reason.
And the existing hppa/hurd/kfreebsd patches from Debian are unlikely to
make sense in OE.
I just integrate debian patches as a whole, if you are familiar with
elfutils and
make sure some of them does not make sense, modification on them is welcome
//Hongxu
//Hongxu
cu
Adrian
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
