Kindly ping.

Zhe

On 8/23/19 3:26 PM, zhe...@windriver.com wrote:
> From: He Zhe <zhe...@windriver.com>
>
> Add a patch to fix the following failure.
> rt_sigtimedwait01    1  TFAIL  :  .../sigwaitinfo01.c:58: test_empty_set
> (.../sigwaitinfo01.c: 148): Unexpected failure:
> TEST_ERRNO=EINVAL(22): Invalid argument
>
> Signed-off-by: He Zhe <zhe...@windriver.com>
> ---
>  ..._sigwaitinfo01-Fix-failure-for-MIPS-arche.patch | 49 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  meta/recipes-extended/ltp/ltp_20190517.bb          |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 
> meta/recipes-extended/ltp/ltp/0001-syscalls-rt_sigwaitinfo01-Fix-failure-for-MIPS-arche.patch
>
> diff --git 
> a/meta/recipes-extended/ltp/ltp/0001-syscalls-rt_sigwaitinfo01-Fix-failure-for-MIPS-arche.patch
>  
> b/meta/recipes-extended/ltp/ltp/0001-syscalls-rt_sigwaitinfo01-Fix-failure-for-MIPS-arche.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..9a0df74
> --- /dev/null
> +++ 
> b/meta/recipes-extended/ltp/ltp/0001-syscalls-rt_sigwaitinfo01-Fix-failure-for-MIPS-arche.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
> +From b4193bc3fdeb278abc54944b4773ffa45ee432af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> +From: He Zhe <zhe...@windriver.com>
> +Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 14:34:43 +0800
> +Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls: rt_sigwaitinfo01: Fix failure for MIPS 
> arches
> +
> +rt_sigtimedwait01 fails as follow on MIPS arches
> +rt_sigtimedwait01    1  TFAIL  :  .../sigwaitinfo01.c:58: test_empty_set
> +(.../sigwaitinfo01.c: 148): Unexpected failure:
> +TEST_ERRNO=EINVAL(22): Invalid argument
> +
> +As this case purposely bypasses glibc, it should align with the size of 
> kernel
> +definition of sigset_t which is different from other arches.
> +https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/signal.h#n15
> +
> +This patch adds specific case for MIPS.
> +
> +Upstream-Status: Submitted 
> [http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2019-August/013313.html]
> +Signed-off-by: He Zhe <zhe...@windriver.com>
> +---
> + testcases/kernel/syscalls/sigwaitinfo/sigwaitinfo01.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> + 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> +
> +diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sigwaitinfo/sigwaitinfo01.c 
> b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sigwaitinfo/sigwaitinfo01.c
> +index 5a32ce1..5c2fa99 100644
> +--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sigwaitinfo/sigwaitinfo01.c
> ++++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sigwaitinfo/sigwaitinfo01.c
> +@@ -128,9 +128,16 @@ static int my_sigtimedwait(const sigset_t * set, 
> siginfo_t * info,
> + static int my_rt_sigtimedwait(const sigset_t * set, siginfo_t * info,
> +                           struct timespec *timeout)
> + {
> +-
> +-    /* The last argument is (number_of_signals)/(bits_per_byte), which are 
> 64 and 8, resp. */
> +-    return ltp_syscall(__NR_rt_sigtimedwait, set, info, timeout, 8);
> ++    /* The last argument is (number_of_signals)/(bits_per_byte), which are 
> 64 and 8, resp,
> ++     * except for MIPS which are 128 and 8, resp.
> ++     */
> ++    return ltp_syscall(__NR_rt_sigtimedwait, set, info, timeout,
> ++#ifdef __mips__
> ++            16
> ++#else
> ++            8
> ++#endif
> ++            );
> + }
> + #endif
> + 
> +-- 
> +2.7.4
> +
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/ltp/ltp_20190517.bb 
> b/meta/recipes-extended/ltp/ltp_20190517.bb
> index b0e2f96..14c1219 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-extended/ltp/ltp_20190517.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/ltp/ltp_20190517.bb
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ SRC_URI = "git://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp.git \
>             file://0002-check-for-RES_USE_INET6-during-configure.patch \
>             
> file://0001-syscalls-tgkill03-wait-for-defunct-tid-to-get-detach.patch \
>             file://0001-ustat02-Fix-EFAULT-in-32bit-compatibility-mode.patch \
> +           
> file://0001-syscalls-rt_sigwaitinfo01-Fix-failure-for-MIPS-arche.patch \
>             "
>  
>  S = "${WORKDIR}/git"

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to