From: Ross Burton <ross.bur...@intel.com> CVEs that are whitelisted or were not vulnerable when there are version comparisons were not included in the report, so alter the logic to ensure that all relevant CVEs are in the report for completeness.
(From OE-Core rev: 98256ff05fcfe9d5ccad360582c36eafb577c264) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.bur...@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster...@gmail.com> --- meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass b/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass index c00d2910be..f87bcc9dc6 100644 --- a/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass +++ b/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass @@ -208,12 +208,14 @@ def check_cves(d, patched_cves): if cve in cve_whitelist: bb.note("%s-%s has been whitelisted for %s" % (product, pv, cve)) + # TODO: this should be in the report as 'whitelisted' + patched_cves.add(cve) elif cve in patched_cves: bb.note("%s has been patched" % (cve)) else: to_append = False if (operator_start == '=' and pv == version_start): - cves_unpatched.append(cve) + to_append = True else: if operator_start: try: @@ -243,8 +245,11 @@ def check_cves(d, patched_cves): to_append = to_append_start or to_append_end if to_append: + bb.note("%s-%s is vulnerable to %s" % (product, pv, cve)) cves_unpatched.append(cve) - bb.debug(2, "%s-%s is not patched for %s" % (product, pv, cve)) + else: + bb.note("%s-%s is not vulnerable to %s" % (product, pv, cve)) + patched_cves.add(cve) conn.close() return (list(patched_cves), cves_unpatched) -- 2.17.1 -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core