On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 17:34 +0800, Xiaofeng Yan wrote: > From: Xiaofeng Yan <xiaofeng....@windriver.com> > > Add demos for checking whether gtk+ run over directfb successfully or not. > > [YOCTO #1674] > > Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Yan <xiaofeng....@windriver.com> > --- > meta/recipes-gnome/gtk+/gtk+_2.24.8.bb | 6 ++++-- > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Why can't we build the demos unconditionally? I'd like to think we could just build these everywhere and drop the patch. Does that cause some kind of problem on X? Cheers, Richard > diff --git a/meta/recipes-gnome/gtk+/gtk+_2.24.8.bb > b/meta/recipes-gnome/gtk+/gtk+_2.24.8.bb > index fb88979..9119d16 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-gnome/gtk+/gtk+_2.24.8.bb > +++ b/meta/recipes-gnome/gtk+/gtk+_2.24.8.bb > @@ -9,12 +9,14 @@ SRC_URI = > "http://download.gnome.org/sources/gtk+/2.24/gtk+-${PV}.tar.bz2 \ > file://run-iconcache.patch \ > file://configure-nm.patch \ > file://hardcoded_libtool.patch \ > - file://no-demos.patch \ > + ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'directfb', > '','${NODEMOS_SRC_URI}', d)} \ > file://cellrenderer-cairo.patch;striplevel=0 \ > file://toggle-font.diff;striplevel=0 \ > > file://0001-bgo-584832-Duplicate-the-exec-string-returned-by-gtk.patch \ > file://doc-fixes.patch \ > " > +NODEMOS_SRC_URI = "file://no-demos.patch" > + > # TO MERGE > # file://entry-cairo.patch;striplevel=0 > # file://filesystem-volumes.patch > @@ -27,7 +29,7 @@ SRC_URI = > "http://download.gnome.org/sources/gtk+/2.24/gtk+-${PV}.tar.bz2 \ > # file://combo-arrow-size.patch;striplevel=0 > # file://configurefix.patch > > -PR = "r0" > +PR = "r1" > > SRC_URI[md5sum] = "0413187f7e596aef00ccd1b54776ff03" > SRC_URI[sha256sum] = > "ac2325a65312922a6722a7c02a389f3f4072d79e13131485cc7b7226e2537043" _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
