Hi Khem, On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 11:26:27AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > > Just checked, we still override that script in our layer, so definitely > > would be happy if this gets merged upstream so I can get rid of our > > custom script downstream. > > > > I think this is good to go got OE-core, but I was wondering if default > script in busybox also need this and perhaps upstream too >
What do you mean by "default script"? https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/tree/meta/recipes-core/busybox/files/default.script ? Upstream could benefit from it, I'd agree. Though, it is technically just provided as an example. https://git.busybox.net/busybox/tree/examples/udhcp/simple.script The reason why I didn't bother to send a patch to busybox before pinging on this patch was that we're already different from the upstream simple.script so it didn't make sense to me to add the Upstream-Status: pending or something on the patch (in some ways, since it's patching the file directly and not adding a patch in SRC_URI). Anyway, digressing. Do you want a patch to be sent to busybox ML (or PR or whatever they use) before taking this patch? Quentin -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
