From: Paul Barker <pbar...@konsulko.com>
This allows the kernel-yocto bbclass to be inherited in a recipe without
needing to include linux-yocto.inc. The bbclass should stand on its own
and linux-yocto.inc does a few things which may not be desired in other
kernel recipes (such as modifying KERNEL_FEATURES).
The LINUX_VERSION_EXTENSION default is not moved as other kernel recipes
may not want this setting in place.
Signed-off-by: Paul Barker <pbar...@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com>
---
meta/classes/kernel-yocto.bbclass | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc | 21 ---------------------
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel-yocto.bbclass
b/meta/classes/kernel-yocto.bbclass
index 141eeafeb9..a0362f6acb 100644
--- a/meta/classes/kernel-yocto.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/kernel-yocto.bbclass
@@ -3,6 +3,22 @@ SRCTREECOVEREDTASKS += "do_kernel_configme
do_validate_branches do_kernel_config
PATCH_GIT_USER_EMAIL ?= "kernel-yocto@oe"
PATCH_GIT_USER_NAME ?= "OpenEmbedded"
+# The distro or local.conf should set this, but if nobody cares...
+LINUX_KERNEL_TYPE ??= "standard"
+
+# KMETA ?= ""
+KBRANCH ?= "master"
+KMACHINE ?= "${MACHINE}"
+SRCREV_FORMAT ?= "meta_machine"
+
+# LEVELS:
+# 0: no reporting
+# 1: report options that are specified, but not in the final config
+# 2: report options that are not hardware related, but set by a BSP
+KCONF_AUDIT_LEVEL ?= "1"
+KCONF_BSP_AUDIT_LEVEL ?= "0"
+KMETA_AUDIT ?= "yes"
+
# returns local (absolute) path names for all valid patches in the
# src_uri
def find_patches(d,subdir):
@@ -475,3 +491,8 @@ python () {
if 'do_diffconfig' in d:
bb.build.addtask('do_diffconfig', None, 'do_kernel_configme', d)
}
+
+# extra tasks
+addtask kernel_version_sanity_check after do_kernel_metadata
do_kernel_checkout before do_compile
+addtask validate_branches before do_patch after do_kernel_checkout
+addtask kernel_configcheck after do_configure before do_compile
diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc
b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc
index f191946f2a..91df9c1cd5 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc
@@ -39,22 +39,6 @@ KERNEL_FEATURES_append = "
${@bb.utils.contains('MACHINE_FEATURES', 'numa', 'fea
# and it can be specific to the machine or shared
# KMACHINE = "UNDEFINED"
-# The distro or local.conf should set this, but if nobody cares...
-LINUX_KERNEL_TYPE ??= "standard"
-
-# KMETA ?= ""
-KBRANCH ?= "master"
-KMACHINE ?= "${MACHINE}"
-SRCREV_FORMAT ?= "meta_machine"
-
-# LEVELS:
-# 0: no reporting
-# 1: report options that are specified, but not in the final config
-# 2: report options that are not hardware related, but set by a BSP
-KCONF_AUDIT_LEVEL ?= "1"
-KCONF_BSP_AUDIT_LEVEL ?= "0"
-KMETA_AUDIT ?= "yes"
-
LINUX_VERSION_EXTENSION ??= "-yocto-${LINUX_KERNEL_TYPE}"
# Pick up shared functions
@@ -69,10 +53,5 @@ do_install_append(){
fi
}
-# extra tasks
-addtask kernel_version_sanity_check after do_kernel_metadata
do_kernel_checkout before do_compile
-addtask validate_branches before do_patch after do_kernel_checkout
-addtask kernel_configcheck after do_configure before do_compile
-
# enable kernel-sample for oeqa/runtime/cases's ksample.py test
KERNEL_FEATURES_append_qemuall=" features/kernel-sample/kernel-sample.scc"
--
2.19.1
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
