On Mon, 2020-03-16 at 13:50 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 1:37 PM André Draszik <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-03-16 at 12:17 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 12:12 PM akuster808 <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On 3/16/20 12:06 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > > rpi had additional diagnostics which should be ignored [1] > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/3195 > > > > > > > > So does this mean OE will take similar patches for every BSP in > > > > the world? > > > > > > > > > > suggest a better way and I will do that in BSP layer. > > > > Not sure about better way, but in my BSP layer I have: > > > > thanks it certainly is better than what I have, I will adapt to it > > > layer.conf: > > ----------- > > DEFAULT_TEST_SUITES_remove_mx7d = "parselogs" > > DEFAULT_TEST_SUITES_append_mx7d = " parselogs_mx7bsp" > > > > lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/parselogs_mx7bsp.py: > > ------------------------------------------- > > from oeqa.runtime.cases.parselogs import * > > > > mx7bsp_errors = [ > > 'list of messages', > > ] > > > > ignore_errors['mymachine'] = mx7bsp_errors + common_errors > > > > class ParseLogsTestMX7BSP(ParseLogsTest): > > pass
Its definitely better. I'd also take patches to further improve things to allow easier customisation by BSPs. I did think there was some mechanism but I'm struggling to remember what was intended. Cheers, Richard -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
