On Tue, 2020-03-24 at 20:06 +0100, Antoine Manache wrote: > Absolutely. > I would add an example of issue I've seen in a software project. > Someone developing a new application and using the image-based SDK > that I provided got the right functional behaviour on target. > Once this application was integrated into the core image of our Yocto > project (new recipe), the same tests on target failed (application > crash). > The root cause was : the two binaries produced were different because > the effective GCC options at compile time were different between both > methods (security flags not enabled when compiling with the SDK). > Antoine
Thanks. Antonine's emails/patches are coming through as html and hence are mangled and I can't apply them which is probably where things got lost previously. I've therefore taken Tom's version with some tweaks to the commit message. Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#136678): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/136678 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/72521987/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
