This was added recently, but it seems be chewing more than what it
should and causes non glibc packages also depend on it.

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com>
---
 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1.inc        |  1 +
 ...se-__getauxval-instead-of-getauxval-.patch | 47 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 
meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0038-Revert-AArch64-Use-__getauxval-instead-of-getauxval-.patch

diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1.inc 
b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1.inc
index 4f383900cf..7d0f17cc10 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1.inc
@@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ SRC_URI = "\
            
file://0035-gentypes-genmodes-Do-not-use-__LINE__-for-maintainin.patch \
            file://0036-Enable-CET-in-cross-compiler-if-possible.patch \
            file://0037-libstdc-v3-Include-system_error-for-std-errc.patch \
+           
file://0038-Revert-AArch64-Use-__getauxval-instead-of-getauxval-.patch \
 "
 SRC_URI[sha256sum] = 
"b6898a23844b656f1b68691c5c012036c2e694ac4b53a8918d4712ad876e7ea2"
 
diff --git 
a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0038-Revert-AArch64-Use-__getauxval-instead-of-getauxval-.patch
 
b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0038-Revert-AArch64-Use-__getauxval-instead-of-getauxval-.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..fc9228277a
--- /dev/null
+++ 
b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0038-Revert-AArch64-Use-__getauxval-instead-of-getauxval-.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+From 2101fb718935c7cf1cc2ad201bdeb1e635b54b0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com>
+Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 11:03:41 -0700
+Subject: [PATCH] Revert "[AArch64] Use __getauxval instead of getauxval in LSE
+ detection code in libgcc"
+
+This reverts commit 5a57016dd2758cc63a544f191f77635342397a72.
+
+Upstream-Status: Pending
+Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com>
+---
+ libgcc/config/aarch64/lse-init.c | 17 ++++++++---------
+ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/libgcc/config/aarch64/lse-init.c 
b/libgcc/config/aarch64/lse-init.c
+index 00e9ab8cd1c..74acef25cce 100644
+--- a/libgcc/config/aarch64/lse-init.c
++++ b/libgcc/config/aarch64/lse-init.c
+@@ -29,20 +29,19 @@ see the files COPYING3 and COPYING.RUNTIME respectively.  
If not, see
+ _Bool __aarch64_have_lse_atomics
+   __attribute__((visibility("hidden"), nocommon));
+ 
+-/* Gate availability of __getauxval on glibc.  All AArch64-supporting glibc
+-   versions support it.  */
+-#ifdef __gnu_linux__
++/* Disable initialization of __aarch64_have_lse_atomics during bootstrap.  */
++#if !defined(inhibit_libc) && defined(HAVE_SYS_AUXV_H)
++# include <sys/auxv.h>
+ 
+-# define AT_HWCAP     16
+-# define HWCAP_ATOMICS        (1 << 8)
+-
+-unsigned long int __getauxval (unsigned long int);
++/* Disable initialization if the system headers are too old.  */
++# if defined(AT_HWCAP) && defined(HWCAP_ATOMICS)
+ 
+ static void __attribute__((constructor))
+ init_have_lse_atomics (void)
+ {
+-  unsigned long hwcap = __getauxval (AT_HWCAP);
++  unsigned long hwcap = getauxval (AT_HWCAP);
+   __aarch64_have_lse_atomics = (hwcap & HWCAP_ATOMICS) != 0;
+ }
+ 
+-#endif /* __gnu_linux__  */
++# endif /* HWCAP */
++#endif /* inhibit_libc */
-- 
2.26.2

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#138133): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/138133
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/74142400/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to