The problematic bit is: # only supported by x86 and powerpc BOOST_LIBS_append_x86 = " context coroutine" BOOST_LIBS_append_x86-64 = " context coroutine" BOOST_LIBS_append_powerpc = " context coroutine" BOOST_LIBS_append_arm = " context coroutine" BOOST_LIBS_append_aarch64 = " context coroutine" # need consistent settings for native builds (x86 override not applied for native) BOOST_LIBS_remove_class-native = " context coroutine"
I'd just drop this all, and always enable the two; if they're still not supported by some targets, then target-specific _remove can be used. Alex On Sat, 23 May 2020 at 10:49, Konrad Weihmann <kweihm...@outlook.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > For reasons that are beyond my control I need to have boost_context > available from boost-native. > Unfortunately I didn't found a way of enabling it by a bbappend, only a > full fork of the recipe would help. > > It seems to be caused by that single line > > BOOST_LIBS_remove_class-native = " context coroutine" (from boost.inc) > > as remove-operation is always the last in the chain of processing any > attempt to add won't work here. > > Any ideas how to add it without forking the whole recipe? > > Also this is another example for the ongoing discussion about remove, > ??= and ?= operators in architecture list and that there might be an > alternative needed > > Regards > Konrad > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#138620): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/138620 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/74416620/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
