On Wed, 2020-05-27 at 11:59 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 08:50:11AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > asm/bpf_perf_event.h does not exist in older kernels e.g. ( 4.1 ) > > this helps in using common header across multiple versions of > > kernel > > going back > > This check should have been there from the beginning and for every > header > file. It's big PITA to sync this list up, especially when dealing > with > different glibc or kernel than OE-Core, e.g. external toolchains, > etc. > > Any objections to making this check more generic for every entry in > the list?
Yes, a strong objection. We don't want to support or encourage every kernel version out there. I also don't understand why people need to change the libc-headers anyway :( Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#138820): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/138820 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/74502640/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-