On Wed, 2020-05-27 at 11:59 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 08:50:11AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > asm/bpf_perf_event.h does not exist in older kernels e.g. ( 4.1 )
> > this helps in using common header across multiple versions of
> > kernel
> > going back
> 
> This check should have been there from the beginning and for every
> header 
> file. It's big PITA to sync this list up, especially when dealing
> with 
> different glibc or kernel than OE-Core, e.g. external toolchains,
> etc.
> 
> Any objections to making this check more generic for every entry in
> the list?

Yes, a strong objection. We don't want to support or encourage every
kernel version out there. 

I also don't understand why people need to change the libc-headers
anyway :(

Cheers,

Richard

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#138820): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/138820
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/74502640/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to