On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Eric Bénard <e...@eukrea.com> wrote: > Hi, Khem, > > Le 14/12/2011 19:38, Khem Raj a écrit : > >> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Ulf Samuelsson >> <openembedded-c...@emagii.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Not familiar with gcc internals, but just want to reiterate the point >>> that the problem occured (the one I saw) only when I had >>> BB_NUMBER_THREADS at a high value, so WHEN things are done seems to be >>> important. >> >> > Seems more complicated than this. A customeer reproduced it with BB_THREAD=2 > and PARALLEL=j3 ... (I never reproduced in with BB_THREAD < 5) >
Can you see when gcc-runtime was finished building and staging w.r.t to the failing app > >> could you test out this patch in your configuration and see if you still >> see the problem ? >> > I reproduced the problem with this patch and BB_THREAD=8 so this patch > doesn't > improve the current behaviour. thats was my original expectation > > Eric _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
