On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 3:55 PM Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 12:47 PM Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 5:27 AM Richard Purdie
> > <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, 2020-08-16 at 18:55 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 9:47 AM Richard Purdie <
> > > > richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, 2020-08-15 at 19:41 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > > > > > Bruce,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We need
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/168200b6d6ea0cb5765943ec5da5b8149701f36a
> > > > > > backported to 5.4 kernels for perf to build with -fno-common can
> > > > > you
> > > > > > queue this in your kernel updates as soon as you can ?
> > > > >
> > > > > I think we have other active kernels which will also need it as
> > > > > even
> > > > > with Khem's patch we still see failures:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I've taken care of linux-yocto now, I don't think there are any
> > > > active use cases for those kernels that won't be covered.
> > >
> > > I bumped the meta-yocto BSPs with a quickly hacked up patch but we
> > > still see:
> > >
> > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/65/builds/2339
> > >
> > > so I think there may be another patch we need somewhere...
> > >
> > > (which matches what we saw with Khem's _append which also failed).
> > >
> >
> > there seems to be concaternation of compiler options without space
> >
> > | arm-poky-linux-gnueabi-gcc: error: unrecognized argument in option
> > '-mfpu=neon/include/uapi/asm-generic/errno.h'
> > | arm-poky-linux-gnueabi-gcc: note: valid arguments to '-mfpu=' are:
> > auto crypto-neon-fp-armv8 fp-armv8 fpv4-sp-d16 fpv5-d16 fpv5-sp-d16
> > neon neon-fp-armv8 neon-fp16 neon-vfpv3 neon-vfpv4 vfp vfp3 vfpv2
> > vfpv3 vfpv3-d16 vfpv3-d16-fp16 vfpv3-fp16 vfpv3xd vfpv3xd-fp16 vfpv4
> > vfpv4-d16
> > | arm-poky-linux-gnueabi-gcc: fatal error: no input files
> >
> > but it also showed up on x86_64 in one of your prior builds, so I
> > wonder if its something in kernel build system or is it processing
> > TUNE_CCARGS in special ways.
> >
> > > There is still some piece of this we're missing, maybe on non-IA.
> > >
>
> Perhaps these kernel backports might help
>
>
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/7597ce89b3ed239f7a3408b930d2a6c7a4c938a1
>
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/6d1f916265aa615218d341ba5d3fd39dfe931cde


I unfortunately had to clean and rebuild my development machine, so only
now started a reference h/w build to see what's up with perf.

I'll follow up tomorrow when I have some input.

Cheers,

Bruce



>
>
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Richard
> > >
>


-- 
- Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee
at its end
- "Use the force Harry" - Gandalf, Star Trek II
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#141582): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/141582
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/75983138/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to