On 12/21/2011 02:16 PM, Víctor Enríquez wrote:
This work was made by Victor Enriquez and then modified by Denis Carikli who
was helped by Mark Hatle comments (who is fray on
#yocto channel on Freenode).
The changes are for adding support to armv6-novfp, for building binaries for
armv6 machines without vfp, for example the htc
dream.
Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle<mark.ha...@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli<gnu...@no-log.org>
Signed-off-by: Víctor Enríquez<victor.quicksil...@gmail.com>
---
meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv6.inc | 28 +++++++++++++-------
meta/conf/machine/include/arm/feature-arm-vfp.inc | 4 ++-
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv6.inc
b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv6.inc
index da8274e..f9c112e 100644
--- a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv6.inc
+++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv6.inc
@@ -10,24 +10,32 @@ MACHINEOVERRIDES .= "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "armv6",
":armv6", ""
require conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv5-dsp.inc
# Little Endian
-AVAILTUNES += "armv6 armv6t armv6hf armv6thf"
+AVAILTUNES += "armv6-novfp armv6 armv6t armv6t-novfp armv6hf armv6thf"
+TUNE_FEATURES_tune-armv6-novfp ?= "armv6"
TUNE_FEATURES_tune-armv6 ?= "armv6 vfp"
+TUNE_FEATURES_tune-armv6t-novfp ?= "armv6 thumb"
TUNE_FEATURES_tune-armv6t ?= "armv6 vfp thumb"
TUNE_FEATURES_tune-armv6hf ?= "${TUNE_FEATURES_tune-armv6}
callconvention-hard"
TUNE_FEATURES_tune-armv6thf ?= "${TUNE_FEATURES_tune-armv6t}
callconvention-hard"
-PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv6 = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv5e-vfp}
armv6-vfp"
-PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv6t = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv5te-vfp}
armv6-vfp armv6t-vfp"
-PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv6hf = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv5ehf-vfp}
armv6hf-vfp"
-PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv6thf = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv5tehf-vfp}
armv6hf-vfp armv6thf-vfp"
+PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv6-novfp = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv5e}
armv6-novfp"
+PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv6 = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv5e-vfp}
armv6-novfp armv6"
+PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv6t-novfp = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv5e}
armv6-novfp armv6t-novfp"
+PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv6t = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv5te-vfp}
armv6-novfp armv6t-novfp armv6-vfp armv6t"
I am not sure I fully understand the changes here, so this might be a
mis-understanding on my part, but should this and the tune-armv6 have
both -vfp and -novfp in it?
+PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv6hf = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv5ehf-vfp}
armv6hf"
+PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv6thf = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv5tehf-vfp}
armv6hf-vfp armv6thf"
# Big Endian
-AVAILTUNES += "armv6b armv6tb armv6hfb armv6thfb"
+AVAILTUNES += "armv6b-novfp armv6b armv6tb-novfp armv6tb armv6hfb armv6thfb"
+TUNE_FEATURES_tune-armv6b-novfp ?= "${TUNE_FEATURES_tune-armv6-novfp}
bigendian"
TUNE_FEATURES_tune-armv6b ?= "${TUNE_FEATURES_tune-armv6} bigendian"
+TUNE_FEATURES_tune-armv6tb-novfp ?= "${TUNE_FEATURES_tune-armv6t-novfp}
bigendian"
TUNE_FEATURES_tune-armv6tb ?= "${TUNE_FEATURES_tune-armv6t} bigendian"
TUNE_FEATURES_tune-armv6hfb ?= "${TUNE_FEATURES_tune-armv6b}
callconvention-hard"
TUNE_FEATURES_tune-armv6thfb ?= "${TUNE_FEATURES_tune-armv6tb}
callconvention-hard"
-PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv6b = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv5eb-vfp}
armv6b-vfp"
-PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv6tb = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv5teb-vfp}
armv6b-vfp armv6tb-vfp"
-PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv6hfb = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv5ehfb-vfp}
armv6hfb-vfp"
-PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv6thfb = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv5tehfb-vfp}
armv6hfb-vfp armv6thfb-vfp"
+PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv6b-novfp = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv5eb}
armv6b-novfp"
+PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv6b = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv5eb-vfp}
armv6b"
Why not like the armv6 above with -novfp (again, maybe my misunderstanding
+PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv6tb-novfp = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv5eb}
armv6b-novfp armv6tb-novfp"
+PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv6tb = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv5teb-vfp}
armv6b-novfp armv6tb-novfp armv6b-vfp armv6tb"
This seems to match armv6t above.
+PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv6hfb = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv5ehfb-vfp}
armv6hfb"
+PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv6thfb = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv5tehfb-vfp}
armv6hfb-vfp armv6thfb"
diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/feature-arm-vfp.inc
b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/feature-arm-vfp.inc
index 29a925c..78f453c 100644
--- a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/feature-arm-vfp.inc
+++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/feature-arm-vfp.inc
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
TUNEVALID[vfp] = "Enable Vector Floating Point (vfp) unit."
-ARMPKGSFX_FPU .= "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "vfp", "-vfp", "" ,d)}"
+TUNE_ARM_VFP = "${@bb.utils.contains("ARMPKGARCH", "armv6", "", "vfp" ,d)}"
should this be -vfp?
+TUNE_ARM_NOVFP = "${@bb.utils.contains("ARMPKGARCH", "armv6", "-novfp", ""
,d)}"
+ARMPKGSFX_FPU .= "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "vfp", "${TUNE_ARM_VFP}",
"${TUNE_ARM_NOVFP}" ,d)}"
TUNEVALID[callconvention-hard] = "Enable EABI hard float call convention, requires
VFP."
TUNE_CCARGS += "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "vfp", bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES",
"callconvention-hard", "-mfloat-abi=hard", "-mfloat-abi=softfp", d), "" ,d)}"
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core