Hi,
>-----Original Message-----
>From: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org <openembedded-
>c...@lists.openembedded.org> On Behalf Of Max Krummenacher via
>lists.openembedded.org
>Sent: 18 December 2020 09:52
>To: Diego Sueiro <diego.sue...@arm.com>; openembedded-
>c...@lists.openembedded.org
>Cc: nd <n...@arm.com>
>Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: set SYSROOT_DIRS to /boot and
>${sysconfdir}
>
>Hi
>
>Am Donnerstag, den 17.12.2020, 11:23 +0000 schrieb Diego Sueiro:
>> Since do_install is shipping files to /boot and ${sysconfdir}, we can
>> set SYSROOT_DIRS to these dirs and allow recipes which depend on
>> u-boot to use its installed artifacts from RECIPE_SYSROOT instead of
>DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Diego Sueiro <diego.sue...@arm.com>
>> ---
>> meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
>> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
>> index 251178db33..6af0766571 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
>> @@ -266,6 +266,8 @@ FILES_${PN}-env = " \ "
>>
>> FILES_${PN} = "/boot ${datadir}"
>> +SYSROOT_DIRS = "/boot ${sysconfdir}"
>
>Wouldn't a += be more future proof. I.e. not dropping the directories which
>are staged by default.
>
>Max
Thanks for your review. A v2 is under way.
>
>> +
>> RDEPENDS_${PN} += "${PN}-env"
>>
>> do_deploy () {
>>
>>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#146344):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/146344
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/79034125/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
