On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 6:34 AM Richard Purdie < richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> The original patch contained some text which shouldn't have been there > and used brackets in configure which isn't a great idea. Tweak the patch > to resolve this. > > Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> > --- > meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/sourcedateepoch.patch | 5 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/sourcedateepoch.patch > b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/sourcedateepoch.patch > index 285d258c635..6d0b1486ad3 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/sourcedateepoch.patch > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/sourcedateepoch.patch > @@ -9,13 +9,12 @@ Index: opkg-0.4.4/configure.ac > =================================================================== > --- opkg-0.4.4.orig/configure.ac > +++ opkg-0.4.4/configure.ac > -@@ -281,7 +281,12 @@ AC_FUNC_UTIME_NULL > +@@ -281,7 +281,11 @@ AC_FUNC_UTIME_NULL > AC_FUNC_VPRINTF > AC_CHECK_FUNCS([memmove memset mkdir regcomp strchr strcspn strdup > strerror strndup strrchr strstr strtol strtoul sysinfo utime]) > > -CLEAN_DATE=`date +"%B %Y" | tr -d '\n'` > -+1607446883 > -+if [ ! -z "$SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH" ]; then > ++if ! -z "$SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH" ; then > This doesn't look like valid shell syntax - there should be a 'test' command before the '!', right? Or change the whole thing to use AS_IF. -Matt + CLEAN_DATE=`LC_ALL=C date -d @$SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH +"%B %Y" | tr -d > '\n'` > +else > + CLEAN_DATE=`date +"%B %Y" | tr -d '\n'` > -- > 2.27.0 > > > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#147861): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/147861 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/80505499/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-