On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 12:50 PM Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca> wrote: > > > more a style issue than anything else, but one of the other oddities > in this layer i've been handed is the bbappending to standard OE > images, so that recipes-core/images/ contains recipe files like: > > core-image-minimal.bbappend > core-image-minimal-dev.bbappend > > and so on. that just creeps me out -- my plan is to forcefully advise > people to leave the stock images alone, and create clearly internal, > proprietary ones, like: > > acme-core-image-minimal.bb
A clearly internal proprietary image would remove the reference to oe-core from the image name, so "acme-image-minimal.bb" rather than "acme-core-image-minimal.bb". > that inherit or include, then do the adjusting. > > or is that approach considered acceptable? (it just makes me cringe, > personally.) I don't know. Adding to the core images doesn't seem like the worst thing someone could do. After all, it's normal to add to or modify the package groups which go into the core images (either directly or indirectly by changing distro features). Creating your own dedicated images is cleaner and clearer though. > rday > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#149797): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/149797 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/81534425/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
