On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 2:22 AM Shachar Menashe <shac...@vdoo.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 1:46 PM Shachar Menashe <shac...@vdoo.com> wrote:
>
> Last time we talked about this I thought we would need to change something in 
> openssl build settings to make the openssl binary get built just for this 
> solution, and that was what got rejected.
> But actually now I see (or perhaps it got changed) that the openssl binary is 
> built anyways, in any build that already relies on openssl.
> So my suggestion is to enable this feature. Like I said in builds with 
> openssl it will make everything more secure in a transparent manner, and in 
> builds without openssl it will display a warning just like today.
> I wouldn't consider it a hacky solution since this is the official solution 
> for this issue.
>
> It's very clearly a hack. Maybe it's the "official solution" for
> supporting https with busybox wget, but OE has a wider scope - we're
> not limited to busybox wget if a better overall solution is available.
>
> This is also exacerbated due to the fact that there are no other alternatives 
> for secure download from CLI (ex. the sato build doesn't contain the "curl" 
> standalone binary)
>
> I don't see an issue with adding curl to any OE reference image which
> needs an https client.
>
> OK, so do you suggest adding curl and removing wget? (that would be a patch 
> with a configuration change to busybox)

Yes, sounds good to me.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#150751): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/150751
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/82240467/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to