On Tue, 25 May 2021 at 16:16, Richard Purdie < richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-05-25 at 16:02 +0200, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > > Sorry, but that is not a good answer. If the next version upgrade > > is a pain because of those patches, I will actually make a patch > > that drops them. > > I'm going to wade in on this at this point. > > systemd is a tricky one. Khem has been doing a good job keeping it > working on musl and that is important to some set of our users so > I'm going to continue to enable him and others to do that. > > I'm not sure the current patch approach cases a huge issue, worst > case it gets broken and then fixed as just happened. > That's ok, but then I would suggest that systemd version updates do not rebase the musl patches, and that is dealt with after the fact by those who need the feature. Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#152230): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/152230 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/83046735/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
