On Sun, 2021-07-04 at 10:59 +0200, Peter Bergin wrote: > On 2021-07-03 16:55, Mittal, Anuj wrote: > > On Fri, 2021-07-02 at 13:59 +0200, Peter Bergin wrote: > > > This reverts commit 10aa1291979fb90bed1beb49be4d406ed0e1e4d5. > > > > > > As there is no build dependency between libubootenv and the > > > configuration > > > of u-boot there is no reason to check for UBOOT_CONFIG or UBOOT_MACHINE > > > by adding the class uboot-config. Revert this in order to remove > > > useless > > > workaround in bsp layer (meta-freescale). > > This was added to address failures in world builds: > > > > https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/141757 > > > > If this is not required, then I think we'd need to address those > > failures. > > Thanks for the pointer about the reason for this patch. I searched a bit > but could not find it. > > Can you please help me define 'world builds'?
"bitbake world" i.e. build everything > By reading the mail thread my thoughts are that the obvious thing is > that the build has a bad configuration as u-boot is skipped. This should > be the thing to solve. Not every MACHINE will support u-boot or have a configuration for it. > Do we have other examples in oe-core where we have a RRECOMMENDS and a > requirement that another package is built. Isn't RDEPENDS used for that > case? RDEPENDS is a hard requirement, RRECOMMENDS is a "soft" one. Bitbake treats them the same in the sense it will always follow them, the destinction is left to the package manager at the root filesystem creation time. Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#153516): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/153516 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/83938334/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
