On Wed, 2021-07-07 at 14:05 +0100, Mike Crowe wrote: > On Wednesday 07 July 2021 at 13:25:17 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-07-07 at 12:53 +0100, Mike Crowe via lists.openembedded.org > > wrote: > > > We're using LICENSE_CREATE_PACKAGE to create ${PN}-lic package files and > > > relying on the automatically generated recommends to cause them to be > > > installed in the image. This works well for most packages, but fails for > > > packages where we only install package created using PACKAGES_DYNAMIC. > > > > > > For example, liborc is being installed in our image but that package lacks > > > a recommends for orc-lic, so the licences that apply to it are not being > > > installed. This is because license.bbclass:add_package_and_files iterates > > > only over the packages listed in PACKAGES. > > > > > > Steps to reproduce on current master: > > > > > > $ echo 'LICENSE_CREATE_PACKAGE = "1"' >> conf/local.conf > > > $ bitbake orc > > > $ dpkg-deb -I > > > tmp-glibc/deploy/ipk/armv7vet2hf-neon/orc_0.4.32-r0_armv7vet2hf-neon.ipk|grep > > > Recommends > > > Recommends: orc-lic > > > $ dpkg-deb -I > > > tmp-glibc/deploy/ipk/armv7vet2hf-neon/liborc-0.4-0_0.4.32-r0_armv7vet2hf-neon.ipk|grep > > > Recommends > > > $ > > > > > > (I would have expected the last command to produce the same output as the > > > penultimate one.) > > > > > > Even if I could fathom out how to fix orc and any other recipes so that > > > they > > > did add the ${PN}-lic dependency, I'd be worried about not noticing that > > > the problem affected other recipes in the future. > > > > > > Is there a way to teach license.bbclass:add_package_and_files to add the > > > ${PN}-lic recommends for dynamic packages, or would it be necessary to > > > teach package.bbclass to do so? > > > > That all sounds rather horrible :/. > > > > Would IMAGE_INSTALL_COMPLEMENTARY += "*-lic" work instead? > > That seems to have worked well. > > I wonder whether this means that it would be better to stop adding the > recommends automatically and tell users that need this to use > IMAGE_INSTALL_COMPLEMENTARY instead (either directly, or by teaching > license_image.bbclass to modify it based on another variable.)
That would seem the better option to me at least... > Losing the recommends would also meaan I wouldn't need to add > --no-recommends to the image recipes that don't need the licence files. > > Thanks for the speedy response! No problem, glad it works/helps! Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#153655): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/153655 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/84042415/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-