This lengthens dependency chains unnecessarily;
also -native versions are already included in DEPENDS via binutils.inc:

DEPENDS = "flex-native bison-native zlib-native gnu-config-native 
autoconf-native"

I have also checked that nothing in binutils needs anything from target
sysroots of flex/bison:
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/155131

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kana...@gmail.com>
---
 meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils_2.37.bb | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils_2.37.bb 
b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils_2.37.bb
index ff9377049b..7430bf1342 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils_2.37.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils_2.37.bb
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 require binutils.inc
 require binutils-${PV}.inc
 
-DEPENDS += "flex bison zlib"
+DEPENDS += "zlib"
 
 EXTRA_OECONF += "--with-sysroot=/ \
                 --enable-install-libbfd \
-- 
2.31.1

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#155277): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/155277
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/85133309/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to