On Tue, 2021-09-14 at 17:27 +0200, Konrad Weihmann wrote: > > On 12.09.21 18:01, Joshua Watt wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 12, 2021, 10:58 AM Richard Purdie > > <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org > > <mailto:richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org>> wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2021-09-12 at 07:55 -0700, akuster808 wrote: > > > > > > On 9/12/21 4:46 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > > We made the autobuilder sstate public a while ago but it wasn't > > useful after we > > > > switched to hash equivalence by default. I'm pleased to be able > > to report that > > > > we now have a read-only public server for the hash equivalence. > > We did have to > > > > fix a small API omission and a couple of sstate related bugs > > but I'm pleased to > > > > be able to report it is now operational and usable. An example > > config would be: > > > > > > > > SSTATE_MIRRORS ?= "file://.* > > http://sstate.yoctoproject.org/dev/PATH;downloadfilename=PATH > > <http://sstate.yoctoproject.org/dev/PATH;downloadfilename=PATH>" > > > > BB_HASHSERVE_UPSTREAM = "typhoon.yocto.io:8687 > > <http://typhoon.yocto.io:8687>" > > > > > > > > I've included an example image build below where it took 11 > > minutes for a > > > > core-image-minimal image build. Obviously this is only of > > benefit if you're > > > > building configurations that match the project autobuilder > > although hash > > > > equivalence could be useful alone in reducing some build times. > > > > > > What branches that support hash equivalence will be available > > other than > > > Master? > > > > The question doesn't make sense as hash equivalence doesn't have a > > "branch". > > We're sharing any hash equivalence data generated from builds on the > > autobuilder. > > > > > > We should (?) backport the BB_HASHSERVE_UPSTREAM patch so that the > > instructions to enable it make sense on older branches though. > > Yes, please - I'd really like to see that in dunfell and hardknott too
Readonly hash equivalence is only in hardknott and master, it isn't in dunfell. The commit in question: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=96b548a79d87120655da3ac5501b8ad4726cf1a4 This means the backport of the recent addition only really makes sense in the context of hardknott. Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#156014): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/156014 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/85549949/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
