On 10/14/21 5:10 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
We now pass compiler options that mean the compiler will adjust these values to
SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH, the compiler warnings are now unneeded.
Is there a chance of it being overwritten by component's build system
in that case this warning may still be handy
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
meta/classes/reproducible_build.bbclass | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/classes/reproducible_build.bbclass
b/meta/classes/reproducible_build.bbclass
index 7571c116c82..fd90d771d2b 100644
--- a/meta/classes/reproducible_build.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/reproducible_build.bbclass
@@ -58,9 +58,6 @@ SDE_DIR = "${WORKDIR}/source-date-epoch"
SDE_FILE = "${SDE_DIR}/__source_date_epoch.txt"
SDE_DEPLOYDIR = "${WORKDIR}/deploy-source-date-epoch"
-# Enable compiler warning when the __TIME__, __DATE__ and __TIMESTAMP__ macros are used.
-TARGET_CC_ARCH:append:class-target = " -Wdate-time"
-
# A SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH of '0' might be misinterpreted as no SDE
export SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH_FALLBACK ??= "1302044400"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#156964):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/156964
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/86310655/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
