On Thu, 2021-10-14 at 18:09 +0100, Mike Crowe wrote: > On Thursday 14 October 2021 at 17:54:18 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Thu, 2021-10-14 at 17:42 +0100, Mike Crowe via lists.openembedded.org > > wrote: > > > On Wednesday 13 October 2021 at 11:48:05 +0100, Mike Crowe wrote: > > > > Use the same WARN_WA and ERROR_QA variables as insane.bbclass to allow > > > > individual recipes, the distro or other configuration to determine > > > > whether a missing licence should be treated as a warning (as it is now) > > > > or as an error. > > > > > > > > oe.qa.handle_error isn't immediately fatal, so track the overall sanity > > > > state and call bb.fatal if required at the end to ensure that the task > > > > really fails. If only bb.error is used then do_populate_lic isn't re-run > > > > on subsequent builds which could lead to the error being missed. > > > > > > > > It seems odd for the license- error classes to be listed in > > > > insane.bbclass but implemented in license.bbclass. All recommendations > > > > for somewhere else to put them gratefully received. > > [snip] > > > > Patch series v4 coming soon. > > > > I did have to rework it a bit as I also ran into a few issues and was just > > trying to get around to writing them up. > > > > I added: > > > > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?h=master-next&id=9e980f1a71e8b6af5ff6da9b02fac0f8bfd9d4fb > > > > which means you can drop the imports. > > > > You can use the nonlocal option to help the "sane" problem: > > > > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky/diff/meta/classes/license.bbclass?h=master-next&id=110fa545ac84e560691c7d9e0d1e6e8f70c66980 > > > > The autobuilder also shows issues as some of the functions you moved are > > referenced in other classes. The patch became: > > > > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?h=master-next&id=110fa545ac84e560691c7d9e0d1e6e8f70c66980 > > Thanks for doing that. I thought I'd searched for other occurrences, but I > must have not done so properly. :( > > > I was also just thinking we should probably add a new function and add > > calls at > > the end of the tasks like: > > > > oe.qa.exit_if_errors(d) > > > > with a definition similar to: > > > > def exit_if_errors(d): > > qa_sane = d.getVar("QA_SANE") > > if not qa_sane: > > bb.fatal("Fatal QA errors were found.") > > > > and then renaming QA_SANE to something like QA_FATAL_ERRORS and exitting if > > set. > > That sounds like it would neaten things up greatly and avoid the risk of > accidentally failing to make the error fatal. It ought to mean that many of > the sane local > variables can be removed too. > > Would you like me to provide new versions of the existing patches or add > new patches on top of the ones already in master-next?
I think a new series I can replace the patches in master-next with would be good please! Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#156971): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/156971 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/86284884/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
