On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 10:41 PM Jose Quaresma <quaresma.j...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > There are any plans or is it possible to backport the SBOM/SPDX to the > dunfell branch?
I'm going to yield to Saul as to whether he thinks this is desirable/possible or not. Steve > Doing a quick look on it I see that it is not too intrusive and the most one > is in > classes/package: Add extended packaged data > 7ec54b174304e940ec66f21ac512f7b50fa637b3 > > Jose > > Saul Wold <saul.w...@windriver.com> escreveu no dia quarta, 27/10/2021 à(s) > 02:31: >> >> Add annotations to relationships and refactor code to add >> create_annotation() function for code reuse. >> >> Ensure that "cross" recipes are factored into isNative also. >> >> v2: removed leftover and unused annotation per Joshua >> >> Sau! >> >> Saul Wold (3): >> spdx.py: Add annotation to relationship >> create-spdx: add create_annotation function >> create-spdx: cross recipes are native also >> >> classes/create-spdx.bbclass | 22 ++++++++++++++-------- >> lib/oe/spdx.py | 6 +++++- >> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> 2.31.1 >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Best regards, > > José Quaresma > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#157604): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/157604 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/86616599/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
