From: Matt Cowell <matt.cow...@nokia.com>

Some symlinks in /proc, such as those under /proc/[pid]/fd,
/proc/[pid]/cwd, and /proc/[pid]/exe that are not real and should not
have readlink called on them.  These look like symlinks, but behave like
hardlinks.  Readlink does not return actual paths.  Previously
pseudo_fix_path would expand files such as /dev/stdin to paths such as
/proc/6680/fd/pipe:[1270830076] which do not exist.

This issue affects:
- deleted files
- deleted directories
- fifos
- sockets
- anon_inodes (epoll, eventfd, inotify, signalfd, timerfd, etc)

Testing:
- run_tests: all tests passed (3 tests check the new code path).
             Checked test output to make sure the new codepath gets executed.
- perftest: measured time before and after applying the patch
            had insignificant differences (roughly ~1%)
- world build: completed without warning/errors

Signed-off-by: Sakib Sajal <sakib.sa...@windriver.com>
---
 pseudo_util.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)

diff --git a/pseudo_util.c b/pseudo_util.c
index b6980c2..b9de81e 100644
--- a/pseudo_util.c
+++ b/pseudo_util.c
@@ -29,6 +29,11 @@
 #include "pseudo_ipc.h"
 #include "pseudo_db.h"
 
+/* O_PATH is defined in glibc 2.16 and later only */
+#ifndef O_PATH
+#define O_PATH          010000000
+#endif
+
 struct pseudo_variables {
        char *key;
        size_t key_len;
@@ -678,6 +683,18 @@ pseudo_append_element(char *newpath, char *root, size_t 
allocated, char **pcurre
         */
        if (!leave_this && is_dir) {
                int is_link = S_ISLNK(buf->st_mode);
+
+               /* do not expand symlinks in the proc filesystem, since they 
may not be real
+                * check if newpath starts with "/proc/"
+                * strlen of "/proc/" = 6
+                */
+               if (is_link && (strncmp("/proc/", newpath, 6) == 0)) {
+                       pseudo_debug(PDBGF_PATH | PDBGF_VERBOSE,
+                               "pae: '%s' is procfs symlink, not expanding\n",
+                               newpath);
+                       is_link = 0;
+               }
+
                if (link_recursion >= PSEUDO_MAX_LINK_RECURSION && is_link) {
                        pseudo_diag("link recursion too deep, not expanding 
path '%s'.\n", newpath);
                        is_link = 0;
-- 
2.25.1

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#158154): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/158154
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/86978294/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to