Hi Anuj,

I'm sorry regarding the patch subject.
The patch is for the master branch. However, the same issue exists for
other branches as well.
I will check the comments from others and will post the patch to the
Hardknott branch once it's approved in the master branch.

Thanks,
Pgowda

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 8:01 AM Mittal, Anuj <anuj.mit...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> This doesn't look hardknott related. Is this for master?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Anuj
>
> On Mon, 2021-11-15 at 06:03 -0800, Pgowda wrote:
> > rust-cross-* imported from meta-rust has incorrect signatures,
> > depending on MACHINEOVERRIDES making it effectively MACHINE_ARCH
> > as shown by sstate-diff-machines.sh:
> >
> > openembedded-core/scripts/sstate-diff-machines.sh --tmpdir=tmp-glibc
> > \
> > --machines="qemuarm64 qemuarm64copy" --targets=rust-cross-aarch64-
> > glibc \
> > --analyze
> >
> >  === Comparing signatures for task do_configure.sigdata between
> >  qemuarm64 and qemuarm64copy ===
> > ERROR: gcc-runtime different signature for task do_configure.sigdata
> > between qemuarm64 and qemuarm64copy
> > NOTE: Starting bitbake server...
> > Hash for dependent task gcc/gcc-
> > runtime_11.2.bb:do_prepare_recipe_sysroot
> > changed from
> > da4ebf1b272cb73153145a0a95e6438d2955ae2d36f84db10f6880b2781ec331 to
> > 47a0ebb7a88c9f896fb9dbce269f575ab8a6faabb2b9e62d164be6e71c5e4e40
> > Unable to find matching sigdata for
> > openembedded-core/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_11.2.bb:
> > do_prepare_recipe_sysroot with hashes
> > da4ebf1b272cb73153145a0a95e6438d2955ae2d36f84db10f6880b2781ec331 or
> > 47a0ebb7a88c9f896fb9dbce269f575ab8a6faabb2b9e62d164be6e71c5e4e40
> >
> > The following patch takes TUNE_PKGARCH into consideration instead
> > of TARGET_ARCH and results in signatures as expected.
> >
> > [YOCTO #14613]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pgowda <pgowda....@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust-cross.inc | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust-cross.inc
> > b/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust-cross.inc
> > index bb625f4240..a77f7d5122 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust-cross.inc
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust-cross.inc
> > @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ DEPENDS += "virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}gcc
> > virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}compilerlibs vir
> >  DEPENDS += "rust-native"
> >
> >  PROVIDES = "virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}rust"
> > -PN = "rust-cross-${TARGET_ARCH}-${TCLIBC}"
> > +PN = "rust-cross-${TUNE_PKGARCH}-${TCLIBC}"
> >
> >  # In the cross compilation case, rustc doesn't seem to get the rpath
> > quite
> >  # right. It manages to include '../../lib/${TARGET_PREFIX}', but
> > doesn't
> >
> > 
> >
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#158338): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/158338
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/87069441/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to