Yes, technically it would be the same. Thanks for the hint.
Vyacheslav
On 15.11.2021 21:56, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
Can't we achieve the same by abstracting the common part into a
function and defining the two tests explicitly?
Alex
On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 21:26, Vyacheslav Yurkov <uvv.m...@gmail.com>
wrote:
It's substituted further down into
def test_sbin_init(self, _, origInit):
parameterized.expand generates two tests out of it. The string
parameter is used as a suffix for the test, the rest is used as
input parameters, i.e. the first test would be called with
origInit=True, the second one with origInit=False.
The sample output looks like this:
2021-11-15 20:21:15,740 - oe-selftest - INFO - RESULTS -
overlayfs.OverlayFSEtcRunTimeTests.test_sbin_init_0_original:
PASSED (295.73s)
2021-11-15 20:21:15,740 - oe-selftest - INFO - RESULTS -
overlayfs.OverlayFSEtcRunTimeTests.test_sbin_init_1_preinit:
PASSED (177.97s)
Vyacheslav
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#158341):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/158341
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/87078063/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
