I think the Unicode should be clear, as the tool (in)directly uses downloads from unicode, but kindly ignores the licensing part of that operation.

Looking into the history of that lib I found https://github.com/kjd/idna/commit/dd8841d50fd506a0b4986542c21fff32ba1779d1, which explains the Python-2.0 part. Not sure, but I think that one can be dropped now.

Maybe someone should raise a ticket upstream to tell them, that even though they convert the upstream unicode data, they still have to apply the unicode terms and conditions

On 02.12.21 17:37, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 8:14 AM Quentin Schulz
<quentin.sch...@theobroma-systems.com> wrote:

In addition to not being an SPDX license, Unicode license also isn't
available in any of the LICENSE_PATH available in openembedded, meaning
the following warning is printed:

python3-idna: No generic license file exists for: Unicode in any provider 
[license-exists]

Unfortunately the license is not really explicit in the project. After
looking at the code, it seems that this license gets pulled by
idna/idnadata.py and idna/uts46data.py which are auto-generated by
tools/idna-data which downloads data from
http://www.unicode.org/Public/{version}/ucd/ and
http://www.unicode.org/Public/idna/ which are covered by
https://www.unicode.org/license.txt as mentioned in
https://www.unicode.org/copyright.html.

Comparing https://www.unicode.org/license.txt to Unicode-DFS-2016
resulted in a match so let's point to that SPDX license instead.

Cc: Quentin Schulz <foss+yo...@0leil.net>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.sch...@theobroma-systems.com>
---
  meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-idna_3.3.bb | 7 ++++++-
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-idna_3.3.bb 
b/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-idna_3.3.bb
index a0e6b79a56..f3c53a8717 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-idna_3.3.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-idna_3.3.bb
@@ -1,6 +1,11 @@
  SUMMARY = "Internationalised Domain Names in Applications"
  HOMEPAGE = "https://github.com/kjd/idna";
-LICENSE = "BSD-3-Clause & Python-2.0 & Unicode"
+# Note: Unicode license is pulled in by idna/idnadata.py and idna/uts46data.py
+# files auto-generated by tools/idna-data which downloads data from
+# http://www.unicode.org/Public/{version}/ucd/ and 
http://www.unicode.org/Public/idna/
+# which are covered by https://www.unicode.org/license.txt as mentioned by
+# https://www.unicode.org/copyright.html
+LICENSE = "BSD-3-Clause & Python-2.0 & Unicode-DFS-2016"
  LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE.md;md5=239668a7c6066d9e0c5382e9c8c6c0e1"

I looked at
https://github.com/kjd/idna/blob/master/LICENSE.md
https://pypi.org/project/idna/

and they seem to indicate that it is BSD-3-Clause so where do the
other licenses come from ?


  SRC_URI[sha256sum] = 
"9d643ff0a55b762d5cdb124b8eaa99c66322e2157b69160bc32796e824360e6d"
--
2.33.1








-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#159094): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/159094
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/87431709/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to