> -----Original Message----- > From: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org> On Behalf Of Khem Raj > Sent: den 2 december 2021 21:21 > To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > Cc: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> > Subject: [OE-core] [PATCH] tune-cortexa72.inc: Add tune for nocrypto case > > RPI4 based on BCM2711 soc which does not enable AES extentions > in hardware see [1] fixes [2] > > [1] https://forums.raspberrypi.com/viewtopic.php?t=207888&start=25#p1642862 > [2] https://github.com/agherzan/meta-raspberrypi/issues/964 > > [YOCTO #14641] > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> > --- > meta/conf/machine/include/arm/armv8a/tune-cortexa72.inc | 8 +++++++- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/armv8a/tune-cortexa72.inc > b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/armv8a/tune-cortexa72.inc > index 2a510bd45bd..b2eb35f111b 100644 > --- a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/armv8a/tune-cortexa72.inc > +++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/armv8a/tune-cortexa72.inc > @@ -6,8 +6,14 @@ TUNE_CCARGS .= "${@bb.utils.contains('TUNE_FEATURES', > 'cortexa72', ' -mcpu=corte > require conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv8a.inc > > # Little Endian base configs > -AVAILTUNES += "cortexa72" > +AVAILTUNES += "cortexa72 cortexa72-nocrypto" > ARMPKGARCH:tune-cortexa72 = "cortexa72" > TUNE_FEATURES:tune-cortexa72 = > "${TUNE_FEATURES:tune-armv8a-crc-crypto} cortexa72" > PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS:tune-cortexa72 = > "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS:tune-armv8a-crc-crypto} cortexa72" > BASE_LIB:tune-cortexa72 = "lib64" > + > +# Some implementations do not enabled crypto ( e.g. BCM2837B0 in rpi4 ) > +ARMPKGARCH:tune-cortexa72-nocrypto = "cortexa72" > +TUNE_FEATURES:tune-cortexa72-nocrypto = "${TUNE_FEATURES:tune-armv8a-crc} > cortexa72" > +PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS:tune-cortexa72-nocrypto = > "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS:tune-armv8a-crc} cortexa72" > +BASE_LIB:tune-cortexa72-nocrypto = "lib64" > -- > 2.34.1
I do realize renaming cortexa72 to cortexa72-crypto would not be backwards compatible, but is it really a good idea to introduce a name like this that does not follow the naming other tunes use? //Peter
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#159104): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/159104 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/87461755/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
